
by Dan Perkins
Diversity
in advertising was a hot topic in 2006,
especially among New York advertising agencies.
In June of 2006, the New York City Human
Rights Commission (HRC) subpoenaed 16
agencies and demanded that they givan an account
for their lack of success in attracting and
retaining talented African Americans.
Over the last 5
years, African Americans have made up only 3 to
6 percent of the total labor force in the
advertising industry in New York, according to
statistics provided by the Bureau of Labor.
That range is only a few percentage points
higher than the level reported in 1968, when
African Americans accounted for 3.5 percent of
the industry.
The HRC, which is
troubled by the fact that so little progress had
been achieved, wanted to know how the agencies
were going to deal with diversity in the future;
and the commission wanted the agencies to make
their results transparent.
In September of
2006, 11 agencies signed binding agreements,
punishable by fines, to increase the number of
minorities in their management ranks - with a
special focus on African Americans.
In early December,
several experts in advertising, media and
education gathered at the invitation of the
Northwestern University Alumni Association
in New York to discuss the lack of diversity
among New York ad agencies and strategies that
agencies are adopting to rectify the situation.
The panelists were
Heide Gardner, vice president, diversity
initiatives, Interpublics Group of Companies;
Dr. Geraldine Rosa Henderson, associate
professor, Northwestern University/Medill IMC
Program; Phyllis K. Rosen, director
of human resources for North America, Ogilvy
& Mather (O&M); and Richard Wayner,
CEO, the TRUE Agency.
The session was
moderated by Alison Fahey, editor of
Adweek. Fahey began the discussion by
asking the panel to explain why African
Americans are so poorly represented in the
advertising industry.
Although none of
the panelists provided a concise answer, each
offered valuable insights to the problem.
A Dearth of
Representation at the Upper Levels
Gardner was the
first to respond to Fahey’s question; and
immediately acknowledged that the answer to
question is a complicated one. To provide some
perspective, Gardner said that there was only
one African American manager in the advertising
agency business in New York City in 1968.
Today, there are approximately 800 African
Americans in the “officials and managers”
category, according to data cited by Gardner.
While the increase
over the past 35 years demonstrates some
progress, Gardner noted that it does not
necessarily equate to a more open and inclusive
industry.
“I would feel very
safe saying that probably 60 to 70 percent of
those people actually work for African American
agencies,” Gardner said to an audience comprised
primarily of advertising professionals regarding
the 800 African American managers currently in
the industry. Gardner conceded that over
the past 35 years, “at least a couple of
thousand” African American managers have come
into major agencies; but she credited the influx
to programs such as the 4-As, the
Minority Advertising Internship Program, and
other initiatives designed to draw African
Americans and other minorities into the
industry.
Gardner said the
problem is most evident at the very top ranks of
major agencies. She noted that with the
exception of Renetta McCain, CEO of
The Americas Starcom MediaVest Group in
Chicago, and Ann Fudge who was chairman
of Young and Rubicam Brands, the highest
ranking African Americans in the advertising
industry are leaders of multicultural shops.
Gardner said the
short answer as to why so few African Americans
are in managerial positions in the industry is
that the agencies have failed to retain and
develop African American talent. Gardner then
stated the root cause of the retention and
development dilemma remains problematic.
Retention is a
critical issue because many successful African
Americans do not perceive as many opportunities
inside major agencies as they do in more
entrepreneurial settings. Gardner said that
entrepreneurial individuals often leave to set
up their own shops, or join existing
multicultural firms where they can make
meaningful and dramatic contributions. Gardner
noted that sharp people often go to the client
side where salary and environmental
considerations are more attractive.
Competitive
Demand for Top Talent
Richard Wayner
brought an interesting perspective to the
discussion. Unlike many of his peers, Wayner
worked for Goldman Sachs before starting
his multicultural agency.
He told the
audience of advertising professionals that he
left the financial arena for the ad industry
because he believes diversity is creating a
global opportunity. He cited a statistic
claiming that roughly 150 million people live
outside of their country of origin worldwide,
and that within 20 years, the number will grow
to 1.5 billion. “Diversity is going to be a
global phenomenon that countries are going to be
dealing with – it will not be just a U.S.
phenomenon,” said Wayner.
To reinforce his
point, Wayner referred to the Billboard
Charts and several other social indicators
that suggest cultural diversity is moving at a
significantly faster rate then demographic
diversity. Wayner, who also launched a
television network in Paris, is keenly
interested in how cultures impact one another.

Although Wayner is
convinced that his agency offers clients unique
and valuable insights to the global marketplace,
he admitted that he also faces retention issues;
but added that other multicultural agencies pose
the greatest challenges. “In advertising, in
general, there’s high mobility, high turnover,”
said Wayner. “We try to do interesting things
with respect to sharing equity or profits with
the leaders of our agency - in order to improve
retention,” but Wayner acknowledged that
retention remains an issue for his agency.
As far as finding
solutions to the lack of African Americans among
New York agencies, Wayner said majority agencies
need to make investments in people and
companies; and they need to bring more African
American into their fold and build them up.
Fahey responded to
Wayner’s remarks by asking whether general
market agencies could recruit and retain a
person like Wayner. Fahey turned to Phyllis
Rosen, who regularly addresses employment
issues, for answers.
Challenges
Faced by Agency HR Departments
Rosen acknowledged
that her agency probably could not attract a
minority individual of Wayner’s caliber. She
said that future employment within the
advertising world would probably be driven by a
different set of dynamics, such as alliances or
associations. She told the audience that about
five years ago, O&M formed an association with
smaller agencies called “The Syndicate.” The
goal of The Syndicate was to tap into very
senior minority talent from around the nation.
Although The Syndicate no longer operates
formally, Rosen said a loose affiliation
continues. She suggested that initiatives
like The Syndicate might be a model for the
future.
“We feel that
diversity has been part of the fabric at Ogilvy,
now we need to be more aggressive about making
it front and center; and that is what we are
doing.” declared Rosen. “But, we don’t want it
to be about counting noses; we want it to be
about making each individual person count.”

As the discussion
continued, it became apparent that the
recruitment and retention of minorities is
complex and multi-dimensional.
Turnovers also
contribute to the dearth of African Americans in
more senior positions within the advertising
industry. Rosen said that she didn’t have any
big ideas or observations for the industry
because she has narrowly focused on O&M;
however, she shared some recent data indicating
that over the past two years, African Americans
have had the lowest turnover of any demographic
group currently employed at O&M. While the
findings were too recent to reveal causes, Rosen
assured the audience that O&M's diversity
consultant will host a series of focus groups to
determine the underlying cause.
Rosen acknowledged
that there are probably invisible barriers at
O&M, but said she hopes the focus groups will
reveal what they are and where they exist.
HR professionals
are challenged to not only recruit talented
minorities, but also assure them of supportive
work environments. Rosen shared her own
observations that talented minorities –
especially on the creative side - prefer to work
on a variety of products for a variety of
clients, and are not necessarily interested in
being in one agency for an extended period of
time.
“For us to tap
into the best talent around, we’re going to need
to be more creative as to how we see the
employment contract; and it’s not necessarily
going to be ‘We’re hiring you, you’re going to
be on our payroll’,” said Rosen who, after
offering this insight, admitted that such
creative approaches might be difficult in
today’s highly regulated business environment.
Rosen also
admitted that one of her most significant
challenges involves finding a way to stop other
agencies from the raiding O&M’s current pool of
minorities.
Seeking
Models for Success
Instead of
focusing on the historic factors that have
caused the dearth of African Americans in the
advertising industry, Henderson urged the panel
to look more closely at the business model for
diversity in advertising. “Yes, there’s a
social model, and yes, there’s this legal model;
but I’m pushing the business model. Market
forces dictate that companies and agencies need
to diversify. They need to diversify their
thoughts,” said Henderson who warned that
companies and agencies that fail to diversify
will not be able to keep up in the future.
Technology was
cited as one of the external forces changing the
way the ad industry conducts business.
Henderson noted that technology has facilitated
the spread of hip-hop culture throughout the
world, and concluded, “It’s really important
that we get a handle on (technology) and that we
move forward very smartly because otherwise
we’re going to lose out,” Henderson asserted.
“I tell my students and my clients, you have to
take a look at the diversity of the marketplace
because it is going to dictate who you hire and
how you hire, and how you proceed. It’s very
simple. How you do it is not so simple.”
When it comes to
linking work force diversity to success in
communicating with diverse markets, Henderson
said that most firms do not capture data in ways
that help them make that link. She cited IBM
as an exception. “IBM is phenomenal,” exclaimed
Henderson. “They have made this amazing
connection between the marketplace and the
workplace and they have really made it work for
them.” She concluded that it is an important
issue for the advertising industry - one that
needs to be quantified more extensively.

The two agencies
represented by panelistsl had very different
results to share regarding their progress in
recruiting more African Americans. O&M reported
a modest trend upward in the number of senior
African Americans found among its ranks, while
Interpublics made progress at the junior level.
“Over the last three to five years, we have
really improved at the junior level,” said
Gardner. “We’re in the neighborhood of 26
percent people of color at the junior level.
Again, it’s the retention and development issues
that we’re struggling with,” she continued.
Race and
Branding
When Fahey asked
the panel to explore the implications of not
embracing diversity, Henderson said the
consequences will be agencies will make mistakes
in developing and delivering their messages.
She cited a recent holiday commercial that
featured an African American family having a
wonderful moment putting up a Christmas tree.
She said she was shocked to see the family place
a white angel on the tree. While she
acknowledged that many African American families
have white angels, she would have advised the
agency and the client to have used a black angel
or a star.
“That’s something
where if you had had black people working on the
agency side, and black people working on the
client side, they would have been able to tell
you (to) go with the star,” said Henderson.
Wayner simplified
the matter by stating, “The business risk is
that you lose your audience. People will go
where they can find more relevant
communication. That’s the long term business
risk.”
Fahey questioned
whether Henderson’s remarks meant that only
black people could make effective ads for black
audiences.
“I’m not saying
that,” Henderson responded. “I truly believe
that you don’t have to have people of that group
market to that group. That would suggest that
the only reason that you would have African
Americans in your firm is to market to African
Americans; and that is absolutely not right, so
I don’t believe that. But what I do believe is
that no matter who it is you have in your
marketing group, they need to be steeped in that
culture - that’s a very important thing to
understand and I think that’s the part that has
been missing.”
Henderson then
explained the concept of coding in
communications. “There’s a sort of unspoken
language that people know that gets embedded in
the messages; and if you’re not aware of that,
you’re not going to pick up on that,” said
Henderson. "But when the receiver receives the
message, they’re going to know that
communication; and they’re going to say, ‘They
didn’t put in the special code.’ ... That’s the
kind of thing that’s hard to pick up over
night. You really need to have someone that has
studied that culture. Do they need to be a part
of that culture? Absolutely not, but it tends
to make it faster for them to pick it up.”
Twenty years ago,
many general market agencies were interested in
hiring African Americans specifically to help
them address African American markets, Gardner
recalled for the audience. She said many
of the agencies hired African Americans right
out of college and placed them within their
organizations to focus on multicultural
business. Gardner noted that these efforts
generally failed because the people hired often
lacked the marketing experience to make
immediate and meaningful contributions.

Gardner cautioned
agencies not to hire with the specific goal of
steering African Americans to multicultural
business. “(Diversity) is a business issue for
all the reasons already articulated, but it’s
also a business issue because this industry is
so insular. There are very few sources of new
thinking and new ideas," noted Gardner. "If
you’re following what’s happening in the
creative economy, and you know the importance of
innovation, then you know that you need people
from a variety of cultures, and a variety of
educational backgrounds, with a variety of
expertise.”
Rosen said the O&M
is trying to define diversity in a much broader
way - with a goal and strategy - and something
that is an inseparable part of the culture of
the agency. “The agency is seeking a diversity
officer who will direct the efforts, but the
goal is to make diversity a seamless process
within the agency,” said Rosen.
Recruiting
for Diversity
Fahey pressed the
issue of recruiting for diversity even further.
“It seems to me, that we have to expose kids to
the industry before we start to hire them,”
asked Fahey.
Rosen said O&M has
a two-tiered approach to diversity recruiting.
According to Rosen, O&M is looking at
transferable skills among more senior managers
on the one hand and has established a junior
marketers program with a high school in the
Bronx to seed interest among the next generation
of potential advertisers.
Rosen told the
audience that O&M’s co-CEO, Bill Grey,
has been actively involved in identifying
diversity strategies that work. She added that
Grey has observed that firms that do well with
diversity recruiting efforts tend to have people
of color in senior positions, which made for
more welcoming and approachable work
environments for minorities to enter. Rosen
said O&M recognizes a need to pay more attention
to recruitment. “The agency has hired a couple
of search firms that specialize in diversity
recruitment, and requires all its search firms
to bring a diverse pool of candidates. The
firms are evaluated quarterly across a
performance matrix,” said Rosen.
While O&M is
taking steps to expand its recruiting efforts,
Rosen said the agency will not relax its
standards to achieve greater diversity.
Wayner suggested
that holding companies become more aggressive in
establishing executive exchange programs that
bring African Americans from multicultural
subsidiaries into the parent organizations'
leading agencies.
Gardner agreed,
but said that moving people across agencies
requires trust and collaboration. “We’re
actually doing that with a two year fellowship
program that we’ve had going now since 2003,"
said Gardner. "So far, we have had 25 people in
the program. Our fellows rotate around
agencies. They spend about six months at a time
in an agency – (serving in account management,
creative, interactive, experiential marketing
positions). They’re not focusing on just
one advertising-marketing discipline. It’s been
a very success program."
Gardner said the
program has increased retention three times
greater than what it would have been otherwise.
“(Our fellows) are
developing at an accelerated pace,” said
Gardner. “It’s helping us to hold on to them
longer. By the time they get through this
program, they have had a mentor who has been
with them the entire two year period."
Garnder told the
audience that at every agency, the fellows have
a coach. "The people who are involved are also
learning about best practices," said Gardner.
"Every manager, HR manager, and mentor goes
through diversity programming and training so
they know each other well and are able to make
the most of the opportunity. We look at it as a
pilot, and so far, it’s working. At the holding
company, we’re supporting our agencies with
executive search services to help them hire more
strategically – even though we hire
just-in-time.”
Fahey noted that
one agency had made seventeen offers to African
American candidates over a two year period, and
that all seventeen offers were turned down. She
stated some of the reasons why candidates didn’t
accept the offers included concerns that the
agency was not committed to diversity, and that
candidates did not want to be “the only one” or
a statistic that was reported to the HRC.
Henderson told the
audience that organizations that have had long
term success with diversity tend to bring in
significant numbers of diverse people at one
time. She referenced the University of
Alabama and the way the university
successfully integrated its football team.
Behr Bryant was the head coach at the time,
and Henderson said Bryant decided to bring in a
group of African Americans all at once so they
would not be isolated, or feel different, and so
they could more easily become part of the team.
While this was an
approach Henderson encouraged New York agencies
to adopt, she wondered how her fellow panelists
recruit for the various disciplines within
industry.
Rosen said
agencies generally go to creative schools to
source creative talent, but said agencies need
to be more creative in how they go after
creative talent. She said O&M has stronger
minority numbers in account management and
interactive positions than on the creative side,
which she said is representative of the
industry. Rosen acknowledged that her agency
has not hired people who have links to networks
that know where emerging minority talent is
located.
Gardner added that
the business model of the industry does not lend
itself to extensive training and development
programs - in part, because agencies are very
small businesses, many agencies employ 50 people
or less. “Presently, most agency don’t hire
until they have a new piece of business or until
there’s an opening; that’s part of managing the
cost,” said Gardner. She acknowledged that many
agencies are also not structured to manage a
large influx of new talent – including African
American talent. “Most agencies are not
structured that way.”
One attendee asked
why agencies fail to look aggressively for
former employees, which is process called
“win-backs.” Rosen said that O&M does that.
Working with
Affinity Groups
While many large
corporations have established affinity groups
that provide networking opportunities for
distinct populations within the organization, it
is not common within the agency arena. Gardner
said that Interpublics has created a small
affinity-style group through their fellowship
program, but indicated that company is currently
working to create an inter-agency affinity group
for all employees of color. She said the
holding company facilitates such efforts, which
helps advance the process. Gardner admitted it
would be more difficult for smaller firms to
attempt to work with affinity groups since many
are not rich with diversity.
Wayner believes
there is an immediate opportunity for holding
companies to create diversity think tanks that
can explore ways to increase the ranks of
African Americans in the industry. He does not
believe it is necessary for agencies to raid
other agencies in order to bring experienced
African Americans into their folds.
Gardner noted that
Michael Roth, chairman of Interpublics,
chairs an inter-agency diversity council
comprised of the CEOs of all of the agencies
held by Interpublics. Gardner added that
Interpublics' board of directors is focusing on
governance and accountability issues as they
relate to diversity, and in February 2007, the
board will host its first diversity review.
The panel
discussion concluded with audience members asking questions,
offering comments and sharing their experiences
with diversity in advertising. One
of the most insightful comments came from Dr.
dt ogilvie, associate professor of
business strategy at the Rutgers Business School,
who said, “What we know
from the evidence is that just putting
minorities or diverse people together is not
sufficient. When companies do
that, performance suffers. One of the things
companies need to know is how to manage a
diverse group of employees and how to create an
atmosphere in which diversity is valued, where
being different is not seen as a negative, but
as a positive and as a stimulus to creativity.”
The End